scarlettina: (WW: Level of discourse)
scarlettina ([personal profile] scarlettina) wrote2008-09-01 10:16 pm
Entry tags:

Last reflections on the GOP VP candidate...for now

Bob Herbert's written a thoughtful op-ed to the Democratic party about how to consider the Palin nomination. Money shot:

Here’s the deal: Palin is the latest G.O.P. distraction. She’s meant to shift attention away from the real issue of this campaign — the awful state of the nation after eight years of Republican rule. The Republicans are brilliant at distractions. Willie Horton was a distraction. The chatter about gays, guns and God has been a long-running distraction. And we all remember the Swift-boat campaign.... Respectful criticism of Sarah Palin is fine. But the great issues of this campaign loom like giant redwoods over the pathetic weeds of politics as usual and the myriad distractions that have turned one presidential election after another into a national embarrassment.

He's right. So far, Palin's been a perfect distraction. We're talking about her ethics violations and her pregnant daughter. We're talking a little bit about Hurricane Gustav. What we're not talking about is the war in Iraq, the economy, health care and all the other important issues that this campaign needs to be about. (There's also the ray gun the Pentagon has developed that was featured on "60 Minutes" -- and be sure to check out the signs the fake protesters are holding; made my head hurt -- but that's another post for another time.)

At the Democratic convention, Obama said:

...if you don't have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from. You make a big election about small things.

It put me in mind of President Sheppard's speech in "The American President," about using fear to distract voters from the issues of the day. (I suppose Obama's speech writer could do worse than taking a cue or two from Aaron Sorkin.)

That's the point. We've been distracted. We need to get focused again. Barack Obama did a fantastic job of focusing our attention by the end of the DNC. We need to find that focus again, and fast.

[identity profile] scarlettina.livejournal.com 2008-09-02 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it's not a death ray; it's a repellent, a sort of people repellent. It's kind of fascinating, actually. And wait until you hear why ithasn't been deployed yet.

[identity profile] selinker.livejournal.com 2008-09-02 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it is a death ray, if you turn it up. The point is that it is not always a death ray—unlike, say, a machine gun bullet. It is a breakthrough, but I think it's far more likely to be used by American security firms at home rather than in counterinsurgencies.

[identity profile] scarlettina.livejournal.com 2008-09-02 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. One way or another, it'll certainly be interesting to see how it is eventually deployed.

[identity profile] oldmangrumpus.livejournal.com 2008-09-03 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. This whole thing is surreal, stem to stern. Just about everyone but the former Marine seems nuts. And, yeah, those "protesters" were pathetic.

[identity profile] scarlettina.livejournal.com 2008-09-03 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Pathetic? Interesting descriptor. Mostly, I was astonished that they allowed a news crew to film the US Army shooting at protesters holding up signs that said, "PEACE NOW" and so on.

[identity profile] oldmangrumpus.livejournal.com 2008-09-03 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
"Pathetic" as in "this was the best the Army could imagine for a 'protester'? That's pathetic."