scarlettina (
scarlettina) wrote2008-09-01 10:16 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Last reflections on the GOP VP candidate...for now
Bob Herbert's written a thoughtful op-ed to the Democratic party about how to consider the Palin nomination. Money shot:
Here’s the deal: Palin is the latest G.O.P. distraction. She’s meant to shift attention away from the real issue of this campaign — the awful state of the nation after eight years of Republican rule. The Republicans are brilliant at distractions. Willie Horton was a distraction. The chatter about gays, guns and God has been a long-running distraction. And we all remember the Swift-boat campaign.... Respectful criticism of Sarah Palin is fine. But the great issues of this campaign loom like giant redwoods over the pathetic weeds of politics as usual and the myriad distractions that have turned one presidential election after another into a national embarrassment.
He's right. So far, Palin's been a perfect distraction. We're talking about her ethics violations and her pregnant daughter. We're talking a little bit about Hurricane Gustav. What we're not talking about is the war in Iraq, the economy, health care and all the other important issues that this campaign needs to be about. (There's also the ray gun the Pentagon has developed that was featured on "60 Minutes" -- and be sure to check out the signs the fake protesters are holding; made my head hurt -- but that's another post for another time.)
At the Democratic convention, Obama said:
...if you don't have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from. You make a big election about small things.
It put me in mind of President Sheppard's speech in "The American President," about using fear to distract voters from the issues of the day. (I suppose Obama's speech writer could do worse than taking a cue or two from Aaron Sorkin.)
That's the point. We've been distracted. We need to get focused again. Barack Obama did a fantastic job of focusing our attention by the end of the DNC. We need to find that focus again, and fast.
Here’s the deal: Palin is the latest G.O.P. distraction. She’s meant to shift attention away from the real issue of this campaign — the awful state of the nation after eight years of Republican rule. The Republicans are brilliant at distractions. Willie Horton was a distraction. The chatter about gays, guns and God has been a long-running distraction. And we all remember the Swift-boat campaign.... Respectful criticism of Sarah Palin is fine. But the great issues of this campaign loom like giant redwoods over the pathetic weeds of politics as usual and the myriad distractions that have turned one presidential election after another into a national embarrassment.
He's right. So far, Palin's been a perfect distraction. We're talking about her ethics violations and her pregnant daughter. We're talking a little bit about Hurricane Gustav. What we're not talking about is the war in Iraq, the economy, health care and all the other important issues that this campaign needs to be about. (There's also the ray gun the Pentagon has developed that was featured on "60 Minutes" -- and be sure to check out the signs the fake protesters are holding; made my head hurt -- but that's another post for another time.)
At the Democratic convention, Obama said:
...if you don't have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from. You make a big election about small things.
It put me in mind of President Sheppard's speech in "The American President," about using fear to distract voters from the issues of the day. (I suppose Obama's speech writer could do worse than taking a cue or two from Aaron Sorkin.)
That's the point. We've been distracted. We need to get focused again. Barack Obama did a fantastic job of focusing our attention by the end of the DNC. We need to find that focus again, and fast.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Otherwise, very much in agreement with what you've said.
no subject
Seriously, though, go and watch the Sheppard speech (and any of the speeches given on "The West Wing") and my guess is you'll hear familiar cadences in the language and similar word choice and usage. More than once during Obama's DNC speech, I found myself thinking, "Gee, he's taken a page from Sorkin." Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and, like I said, he could do worse than taking a cue from there. It's nice to hear a presidential candidate actually inspire me. It's been a long time.
no subject
no subject
I've got to look into that... Hasn't Dick Cheney shot enough people in the face already?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
- ethics in the political arena
- sex education
- teenage pregnancy and the right to choose
I'd counter that any of these things could - and probably should - be major issues to tackle in the campaign.
Ain't a Democrat alive that the right wing would let within a country mile of the white house if they'd been investigated for ethics violations, even though we've had the likes of Cheney and Rove running the show for the last eight years. If McCain wants to distance himself from the previous administration, this isn't starting off on the right foot. It's something to talk about.
Want to reach the heart of America? Talk about what happens when a 17 year old girl who hasn't finished high school gets knocked up, but her boyfriend won't marry her and her parents kick her to the curb, and then have solutions for prevention and support. It's education, it's healthcare.
It's not Iraq or the economy, but they are still valid as issues, and I think that's what people are really talking about. The trick is doing it without making Bristol into a totem of wrong or an inadvertent martyr for the right.
no subject
And I do have an issue with Palin's ethics investigation, but Bristol's pregnancy and Gustav have minimized that as well. As for the rest of the discussions, they've been completely off the table. And I don't think they should be. There are larger issues here, that effect far many more Americans than teen pregnancy. These issues are valid, but with regard to their reach and implications, far smaller than the war and the economy.
no subject
I can't help but wonder what the Republicans would do to a Democrat female VP candidate who had a pregnant unmarried 17-year-old daughter. My guess is that she'd be condemned as an unfit role model on Faux News every night between now and the election.
no subject
no subject
no subject
And what's up with her crazy old pastor, Ed Kalnins, who says that you're going to hell if you voted for John Kerry or criticized George W Bush? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
And what's this about more abuses of power? Palin wanted to fire the town librarian Mary Ellen Emmons - the librarian! - because she wouldn't ban books and supported Palin's opponent in the election.
no subject
Attacking Sarah Palin is divisive, and that is wrong. Tempting, but wrong. Ignore the cheese and avoid the trap.
There are bigger fish to fry than Sarah Palin, or what McCain was thinking. Developing a rhetoric that joins us on our core, base values that bring us together as a people, that propel us into the future with a united, positive vision is what's important. Ignore the tempting National Enquirer bait that's dangled in front.
If the Democrats (and I'm not a Democrat, I remain independent) want to be different, then be different. Just because the Republicans would do something isn't a good reason for the Democrats to do it.
That, at least was never a good reason in my mother's view. She did, occasionally, make a good point.
no subject
I'm more in the crowd of 1) win election 2) then spend next four years cuddling everyone.
Obama can reverse these if he chooses. I'm not that high-minded.
no subject